Interesting cartography project by Eric Fischer: racial breakdowns of 40 U.S. cities, inspired by a similar Chicago map by Bill Rankin. Here’s the Bay Area (based on 2000 Census data). Pink means white people; blue is Black; orange is Latin@; and green is Asian. (Invisible is Native? And Middle-Eastern? Does “Asian” include South Asian? Racial breakdowns are so strange.)
Correct me if I’m off, but I think the TL (where I live, at the Faithful Fools) is the little blue dot north-west of the Mission.
For comparison, here’s NYC:
Via Feministe.
Kloncke 
Hi Katie,
The little blue dot area is actually the Western Addition. The TL is the are that has dots of many colors, as we pointed out here: http://thetenderblog.com/2010/09/21/whats-the-most-racially-diverse-area-in-sf/
See you around the hood!
Ah, thanks evarels! That makes sense, since the TL is so diverse. But I also haven’t seen too many Black folks in the Western Addition in the past year. Maybe things have changed since the 2000 Census? (I’ve heard that a lot of Black families were pushed out of the Western Addition through gentrification.)
It’d be interesting to compare maps from 10 years apart.
Thanks again; see you around!